I am setting in my office; looking out on a beautiful seven acres that is lightly dusted with snow. As much as I like Spring and Summer, the scene is too beautiful not to enjoy. The space heater under my desk is making this blast of frigid air more tolerable.
I am in Kentucky. May will bring the return of warmer temperatures. The grass will be green, the trees will blossom and the sun will shine. May will also bring the Presidential Election Primary to Kentucky.
Of course, by the time I am allowed to cast my vote for a candidate, the candidates will already be chosen. We will know who they are at least by February 5 and perhaps as early as mid-January.
Today in Iowa, there are three front-runners on each ticket. Barak, Hillary and John E. for the Dems. Mitt, Mike and John M. for the Pubs. Unless there are some earth-shattering kinds of changes or a total buck of American political tradition within the next few months, it is safe to say that one of these six people will become the next President of the United States.
I am not going to publicly endorse a candidate – at least not at this point. I will, however, offer up a few of the issues that are impacting how I view these candidates.
First is the issue of immigration. I am not prepared to vote for a candidate that is ready to blanketly sanction illegal immigration. But I cannot vote for a candidate who wants to round up and deport millions of people from the country. It would be nice if there were a candidate with a solution that was a bit more creative than building walls along borders. I am willing to give consideration to a candidate who proposes a means for current “illegal” immigrants to become “legal”. Most importantly, I am not willing to vote for any candidate who would deny education and basic health care to the children of illegal immigrants. These children should not be made to suffer for “crimes” committed by their parents.
Secondly are issues related to the right to life. These issues, for me, encompass both abortion and the death penalty. There are no circumstances under which any human being has the right to take the life of another human being because of their age, size, race, shape, character, crimes or behaviors. As you might imagine, it is difficult to find a candidate from either major party who takes a wholistic approach to the right to life.
Third, are issues related to economics. I believe in free markets and free market solutions, but I also believe that the government has a pivotal role to play in regulating the free markets so that the “least” amongst us are afforded their full rights and privileges as citizens. I do not – in any way- include the middle class in this “least” category. Providing government healthcare for children in families that are making $80,000 a year is not a good definition of caring for the “least” amongst us. I do not want to vote for a candidate that will raise taxes and make the tax system more inequitable than it already is. I do want to vote for a candidate who can creatively encourage free market solutions to economic problems.
Fourth are issues related to national security and global politics. I am looking for a candidate who understands that there are forces at work in the world that are more than willing to murder my children simply because they were born in the United States and are a part of “western culture”. At the same time, I am looking for a candidate who will dialogue with world leaders, actively pursue diplomacy and be a force for peace in the world. I am not willing to vote for a candidate who is ready to remove all American influence from the situation in Iraq, which I am certain, would result in chaos unlike anything we have yet seen in that region. I would like to see a candidate who would be willing to explore the possibility of a 3-state solution in Iraq.
Fifth, are issues related to education. The principles that undergird NCLB (No Child Left Behind) are quite valid. That’s why is was initially approved with bi-partisan support in the US Congress. Having worked in education for a while, however, I am convinced that the execution of the principles of NCLB have been fatally flawed. I am looking for a candidate who will uphold the principles of NCLB, but work more diligently with education professionals to implement those principles.
Sixth, are issues related to personal integrity and character. The candidates and the media are so busy muddying the waters on this issue that it is very difficult to determine which ones of them really are men (or women) of integrity and character. Are they honest? Do they tell the truth? Do they have some opinions (and do they stand up for those convictions) that run against the grain of their party’s status-quo or are they simply trumpeting the same base-pandering load of stuff that seems to work best in winning primary elections?
Seventh is the issue of the environment. I am not, and I repeat, I am not afraid of global warming. Contrary to the media’s continual insistence, the science is not all in on the effects of the impact of global warming. Yes, the earth is getting warmer. Yes, emissions and cow flatulence and so many other things probably have something to do with it. Yes, we should change our ways (light bulbs, kind of cars we build, recycling, etc.). Yes, caring for creation is an important part of living a wholistic, Christian life. How about a candidate deciding that green technology is not an enemy to our economic engine, but could, instead, be used as a creative free-market solution to some of our economic woes. Now is the time for our government to prompt some big, free-market investment in green technology that would make the environment healthier, but would probably also position America at the forefront of the next cycle of economic growth and technological renovation. I am indebted to my father-in-law for this line of thinking. We discussed it over Christmas and I found it to be very persuasive. I think he pulled the idea from Thomas Friedman’s “The Earth is Flat” which is an excellent treatise on the global economy and on global politics.
Those are seven of the big issues for me. I’ll probably have trouble finding a candidate that meets all of those criteria, but I’ll try to get as close as possible.
Read Full Post »