I came back into pastoral ministry after a six year hiatus. During that time I lived my life in “the real world.” I was the Director of a private preschool with 160 children, comprising about 120 families, and employing about 40 employees. During that time something called the Emergent Church became a bit of a phenomenon. I have spent the last eight months learning more about it and studying its leaders, writers and pastors; people like Brian McClaren, Rob Bell, Erwin McManus and Mark Driscoll. I had to do this because when I was studying Christian Ministry as an undergrad and working toward my M.Div., we were still studying the seeker driven model of ministry pioneered by Bill Hybels and Rick Warren. I have discovered that the emergent church is quite different than the seeker driven model (especially in its approach to theology), but not as different as it probably thinks it is from the seeker movement, especially in regards to the practical way that the movement “does” church. For example, I have found that most emergent church websites offer the same kind of catchy ministry titles and the same kind of contemporary styles of worship – as do seeker driven churches – with only a few variations (but a comparison and critique of these models may or may not be a topic for a later post. I have found that too many pastors, whose churches are not growing, spend too much time critiquing pastors whose churches are growing.) I pastor in a seminary town, so I remain constantly aware of just how much we folks who are trained for ministry love to critique what others who are trained for ministry are doing.
All of this has lead me to re-examine what it means to do and to be church today. I want to suggest that doing church in today’s world is not much different than doing church in the first few centuries of the Christian movement. The early church, as I have studied scripture and extant resources, seemed to involve primarily three activities:
1. Celebration. Unless under persecution, the believers gathered together, primarily on Sundays, to worship Jesus and eat together.
2. Cells. The believers met in their homes. In fact, these meetings, I believe, were the heart and soul of the early Christian movement. In these groups and small communities, the believers ate together, shared together, prayed for one another, worshipped and, perhaps most importantly, held one another accountable to following in the ways and teachings of Jesus and to the local Christian community.
3. Community Outreach and Evangelism. These early churches did ministry with the communities around them. In this way, they honored the Biblical commands to love one another and to work for both justice and rigtheousness in our personal and corporate lives. Of course, Stephen is the earliest example of the church’s efforts along these lines.
My sense is that a church that dives into this kind of community is a church that will not be so subject to the ebb and flow of trends, fads, and gimmicks and will – at the same time – manage to always speak with relevance to the culture. I might add that many of the larger megachurches and emergent churches build themselves around this early model for church and it probably explains their success in their communities and in the world.
Of course, all of this is fraught with uselessness unless those involved in a local church build their lives around two simple principles.
1. A life changing experience with Jesus Christ that forever turns the non-believer into a radical, committed follower of Jesus
2. A belief that – as a radical, committed follower of Jesus – the church is the place from which God has chosen to reveal his power to the world and that the church is a “whole-enough” representation of what life will be like following the eschaton of Jesus Christ when the whole world is completely reconciled to Wounded and Risen One. Until that happens, the church of Jesus Christ is the place from which the transformational, reconciling power of Jesus emanates to the world.
That’s my two cents today!